Abstract

Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on the Correlation between Congestion Biomarkers and Blood Volume Measurements in Heart Failure

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Published online:

Correspondence Details:Veraprapas Kittipibul, veraprapas.kittipibul@duke.edu

Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Introduction: Assessment of congestion in heart failure (HF) is challenging. Different biomarkers of congestion have been used in clinical practice, but their correlations with blood volume analysis (BVA) measurements are not well characterized. Furthermore, whether the association differs across left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) subgroups is not known.

Methods: We enrolled patients with HF who underwent BVA and had same-day measurements of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and serum sodium. BVA was performed using the I131-albumin indicator dilution technique. Absolute values and percent deviation from ideal values of total blood volume (TBV) and plasma volume (PV) were reported. The correlation between each biomarker and TBV/PV%deviation was determined using Pearson’s correlation. Patients were categorized into two groups using an LVEF cut-off of 50%. The same analysis was repeated by LVEF subgroups.

Correlation Between Congestion Biomarkers and Blood Volume Measurements Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Phenotypes

Article image

Results: Overall, 43 patients (61 years, 35% female, 37% black, 47% HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]) were included. There was no difference in age, sex, comorbidities, or biomarker levels between LVEF subgroups. CA125 was correlated with TBV%deviation (r=0.508) and PV%deviation (r=0.447; Table 1). NT-proBNP was only correlated with PV%deviation (r=0.355). Serum sodium was not correlated with any BVA measurements. The correlation between CA125 and BVA measurements was only observed in HF with reduced ejection fraction (TBV: r=0.607, PV: r=0.508). In contrast, there was a correlation between NT-proBNP and BVA measurements only in HFpEF (TBV: r = 0.567, PV: r = 0.649).

Conclusion: Correlation between congestion biomarkers and BVA measurements exists but differs between LVEF subgroups. Further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms of these observations.